
- DOWNLOAD VISUAL PARADIGM FOR UML 10.0 ENTERPRISE EDITION UPDATE
- DOWNLOAD VISUAL PARADIGM FOR UML 10.0 ENTERPRISE EDITION CODE
Such an approach provides multiple levels of explanation for the same system, while offering, at the same time, an integrated view of the whole.
DOWNLOAD VISUAL PARADIGM FOR UML 10.0 ENTERPRISE EDITION UPDATE
Furthermore, we develop an integrative approach for the interactions between models of different perspectives through dynamic update of model output-to-parameter integration during concurrent simulations. We present a modeling methodology with a plethora of formalisms to allow the modeler to choose an appropriate formalism at a given level of abstraction while model transformation relates the different formalisms. In this article, we propose a framework for multi-paradigm modeling and holistic simulation of healthcare systems. As it turns out, answering questions concerning behavioral properties of the overall system becomes difficult and therefore not sufficient for an efficient design and analysis of the system under study. Most often, the diverse perspectives of healthcare systems are studied in isolation and using specific formalisms. The domain of healthcare is characterized by a high degree of complexity and a diversity of perspectives, and modelers are often confronted with the challenge of formulating a simulation model that captures this complexity in a systematic and manageable manner. We develop, simulate, and analyze a set of prototypical multi-processor architecture systems demonstrating different synchronization and selection schemes using the DEVS-Suite and MS4 Me simulators. This research also proposes the Parallel DEVS as a formal approach for examining the semantics of the UML Activities. We use the system-theoretic state, component, and hierarchy concepts as the foundation for formulating the DEVS Activity models and supported with a prototype graphical tool developed in Sirius. The syntax and semantics for the artifacts conform to the parallel DEVS model specification and execution protocol. Our approach for behavior modeling is focused on the action and control concepts in the UML activity metamodels and realizing them as artifacts according to the DEVS formalism. The Model-Driven Architecture (MDA) design approach provides flexible yet rigorous layered metamodels for the UML activity diagrams. Finally, we demonstrate the laid concepts with a complete example.īehavior modeling grounded in the Discrete-Event System Specification (DEVS) and Unified Modeling Language (UML) activity specifications is crucial for simulating dynamical systems. We also put the proposed eUDEVS in a much larger unifying framework called DEVS Unified Process that allows bifurcated model-continuity based lifecycle methodology for systems M&S. Further, we will also show that the obtained DEVS models belong to a specific class of DEVS models called Finite Deterministic DEVS (FD-DEVS) that is available as a W3C XML Schema in XFD-DEVS. This paper presents an integrated approach towards crosstransformations between UML and DEVS using the proposed eUDEVS, which stands for executable UML based on DEVS. There have been earlier efforts to integrate UML and DEVS but they haven't succeeded in providing a transformation mechanism due to inherent differences in these two modeling paradigms. DEVS today is used by engineers who understand discrete event modeling at a much detailed level and are able to translate requirements to DEVS modeling code. Unified Modeling Language (UML) is widely accepted in the industry, whereas Discrete Event Specification (DEVS) based modeling that separates the model and the simulator, provides a cleaner methodology to develop models and is much used in academia. Furthermore, a lot of time is spent in development of a model because it needs both domain knowledge and simulation techniques, which also requires communication among users and developers.

This constraints both the model development and the simulation engine that impacts scalability of the developed code.
DOWNLOAD VISUAL PARADIGM FOR UML 10.0 ENTERPRISE EDITION CODE
The developed code is tightly woven around both the model and the underlying simulator that executes it. However, most of the times these two separate areas are taken together. M&S are two different areas altogether and have specific objectives. Modeling and Simulation (M&S) for system design and prototyping is practiced today both in the industry and academia.
